Pabaon Sports

January 28, 2010

UGG Classic Short The Wars of ugg boots

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — admin @ 11:04 pm

When asked by the USA federal trademark office’s examiner, Susan Heller, on March the 7th 1986 “What is the significance of the term ugg?” She was told under oath that “There is no significance of the term UGG Classic Short Boots in the relevant trade or industry.” This is despite the fact that many years prior; ugg, ug, and ugh were all generic terms for sheepskin boots and were so much a part of popular culture, where already referenced in Australian dictionaries.
While generic terms can be snuck into the federal trademark office, the law is quite clear that generic terms can’t not be protected in any legal court anywhere in the world.Many livelihoods are being threatened by Decker’s campaign which could only be described as another example of a giant corporation intent on monopolizing an industry that was never theirs to own in the first place. The difference here is that cheap ugg classic Mini was questionably allowed to go through the trademark process.
In a recent article in “The Sunday Telegraph”, it was reported that Westhaven Industries,UGG Classic Crochet, a non-profit organization, which employs 65 intellectually disabled people to make ugg boots at its factory in Dubbo, Australia, have also been threatened with legal action.
Needless to say that the recent threats and legal harassment from Uggs Crochet Boots Holdings Inc. and its parent company Deckers Outdoor Corporation has outraged not only the dozens of manufactures,Paul Smith Shoes, some who have been making womens ugg classic cardy since 1933, but the Australian public as well, many who are now boycotting all of Deckers’ other lines including Simple, Teva,Ugg New Arrival, and of course cheap classic short ugg boots.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress